Convert RTF to TXT
RTF is a text-based interchange format, but its visible words are surrounded by control words describing fonts, colors, paragraphs, pictures, fields, and layout. TXT removes that surrounding document vocabulary and leaves a stream of characters. That is destructive by design. The result is often exactly what a search index, command-line tool, diff, or text pipeline needs, because those systems should not have to understand an office document just to find a phrase. It is also a poor substitute for the original when page position, emphasis, images, signatures, or editing structure matter. Keep the RTF and use the TXT as a searchable derivative whose limits are visible rather than as a claim that the document was preserved.
Use this without the search next time. Prathom Workbench puts Prathom's tools in your toolbar.
Add to Chrome — freeDrop your RTF file here, or click to browse
Up to 50 MB. Deleted automatically after 30 minutes.
What it does
- UTF-8 plain text extracted from Rich Text Format content
- A small, portable derivative for indexing, scripts, and line-by-line comparison
- Readable paragraphs and table content without RTF control codes
- No watermark and no sign-up
How to use RTF to TXT
- 1
Add the RTF source
Select the RTF you want to index, compare, or feed into another text-based tool. Keep the original file nearby when it has evidentiary value or when someone may later need the formatting and images that a plain-text derivative cannot carry.
- 2
Extract the characters
LibreOffice reads the RTF and writes a plain UTF-8 TXT file on our server. Formatting instructions, embedded pictures, and page geometry are not copied into the output, so the result is intentionally easier for scripts to consume.
- 3
Check reading order and encoding
Search for distinctive phrases, inspect table rows and non-English characters, and sample documents with columns, footnotes, text boxes, or images. Confirm that the application receiving the file reads UTF-8 and understands the resulting line breaks.
How it works
LibreOffice reads the RTF into a document model, then sends the textual content through its plain-text export filter. RTF control words describe character properties, paragraph settings, tables, pictures, destinations, and other instructions. They are interpreted while the file is opened; they are not supposed to appear in the output as a second markup language. The exporter selects characters and writes a UTF-8 stream, leaving the original file untouched.
The output has one dimension where the source may have had several. Paragraphs become lines or paragraph blocks, list items become text with whatever markers are represented as content, and table cells are visited in an order suitable for reading. A page header, side column, anchored frame, and caption may not have an obvious place in that sequence. This is not a conversion bug that can be solved by adding more styling to TXT; it is the central trade that makes extraction useful for search and scripting.
Use the loss as a feature
Plain text is easier to grep, tokenize, compare, archive, and pass between systems. A collection of RTF files can be expensive for a lightweight indexer to understand, while a matching TXT collection is transparent enough to inspect with ordinary tools. Removing typography also makes line-by-line comparisons focus on wording instead of treating a changed font as substantive content. These properties help with inventories, migration checks, discovery portals, and corpus preparation.
The same simplification can mislead a reader. A word may have been a warning label, a footnote, or text inside a table, and TXT may not preserve that relationship. A signature image, approval stamp, or handwritten note represented as a picture is absent. If search results support a legal, historical, or editorial decision, use the text hit to locate the source and inspect the RTF or a reviewed PDF before acting on it.
Pair the derivative with its source
Give each TXT file a stable identifier and retain the source filename, extraction date, and any checksum or retention metadata required by the archive. Check multilingual output in a UTF-8 aware reader, and sample the templates that contain columns, nested tables, footnotes, or fields. Those tests reveal reading-order choices before a whole collection is indexed.
Choose RTF to TXT when characters are the product. Choose RTF to ODT or DOCX when a person must continue editing, HTML when structure is headed for a website, and PDF when the page itself is the record. The conversion is valuable because it is honest about destruction: it produces a small, searchable copy and does not pretend to preserve the parts that plain text cannot express.
Examples
A folder of historical notices entering a search index
The index can now answer a phrase query without parsing RTF controls for every search. That speed and simplicity are the point, but a hit cannot tell the researcher whether a phrase was a heading, a footnote, or text beside a signature. Store an identifier linking each TXT to its RTF so the original presentation can be checked when context matters.
Two revisions compared for wording changes
A plain-text diff highlights changed wording without reporting every font or margin adjustment as a document difference. List markers and ordinary table text may remain useful, while colors, deleted formatting, images, and page placement disappear. Use the RTF copies to review the visual or approval context before publishing a wording change.
Frequently asked questions
What does RTF to TXT deliberately remove?
It removes the presentation model: fonts, sizes, bold and italic emphasis, colors, alignment, margins, page breaks, headers, footers, columns, images, drawings, and most visual distinctions between headings and body text. Control words are not exposed as noisy literal text. Paragraph and table content can remain as readable characters, but the TXT cannot say exactly where those characters appeared on a page or what they looked like. Keep the RTF when any of that context is important.
Is plain TXT useful for searching an RTF archive?
Yes, when the goal is phrase discovery rather than visual verification. A text file is easy to index, tokenize, checksum, diff, and process without teaching every search job how to unpack RTF syntax. Search results should still link back to the source RTF or a reviewed fixed copy. A matching phrase alone does not prove whether it was an approved heading, a footnote, a deleted-looking annotation, or a label next to an image.
Do tables and links survive the extraction?
Ordinary table cell text can be emitted in a linear reading order, often with separators or line breaks that are useful for a script, but borders, merged-cell geometry, and visual emphasis are lost. Link text may remain while the destination address is not retained as a clickable relationship. Test a representative file from each template before building a parser around the output. If URLs or table layout are essential, HTML is a better target than TXT.
Can I recreate the original RTF from the TXT file?
You can make a new rich-text document containing the same surviving characters, but the discarded information cannot be recovered from that derivative. There is no reliable way to infer the original fonts, heading levels, image positions, fields, or page breaks from a plain stream. Treat TXT as an access copy for machines and retain the RTF as the source for future editing, presentation review, or an audit of the original document.