Convert ODT to DOCX
Nothing is wrong with your file. ODT is an international standard and Word can even open it. The problem is social rather than technical: the person you are sending it to opens attachments by double-clicking, and an unfamiliar extension turns a document into a support request.
Use this without the search next time. Prathom Workbench puts Prathom's tools in your toolbar.
Add to Chrome — freeDrop your ODT file here, or click to browse
Up to 50 MB. Deleted automatically after 30 minutes.
What it does
- Opens by double-click on any machine with Word installed
- Headings, tables, lists and footnotes carried across
- Both formats are zipped XML, so the mapping is direct
- No watermark and no sign-up
How to use ODT to DOCX
- 1
Add the ODT
Written by LibreOffice, OpenOffice, Collabora, or any of the office suites that use OpenDocument as their native format.
- 2
Convert
The document's XML is mapped onto OpenXML — the structure Word uses — and rezipped. Both formats describe the same kinds of object, so most of this is a direct translation.
- 3
Skim it before sending
Look at anything with precise positioning, and at the parts you expect the recipient to edit. Those are the two places a small difference costs you a round of email.
How it works
Both formats are the same kind of thing: a zip archive containing XML that describes paragraphs, styles, tables and the relationships between them. The conversion unpacks one description, maps it onto the other's vocabulary, and writes a new archive.
Because the underlying models are so similar, most objects have a direct counterpart. A heading is a paragraph with a named style in both. A table is rows of cells in both. Footnotes, comments and tracked revisions all exist in both, which is why they survive.
The gaps are in the corners — features one suite added that the other never had an equivalent for, and layout details described in units or reference frames that do not line up exactly.
Two standards, and why there are two
OpenDocument was published as an ISO standard in 2006, developed in the open by a consortium and adopted by governments that wanted their public records in a format not controlled by a single vendor.
OOXML — the format behind .docx — was standardized shortly afterwards, by a process widely criticised at the time, and became the default of the software almost everyone already had.
So the two exist for reasons that are mostly political, and the practical consequence is simple: one is technically excellent and the other is what is installed. Converting is how you stop caring which is which.
When to send PDF instead
If the recipient is going to read the document and not change it, neither of these is the right answer. PDF renders identically everywhere, cannot be edited by accident, and never raises the font question at all.
Convert to .docx specifically when you want the document back with changes in it. That is the case where the recipient needs a file their software will edit comfortably, and it is the only case where the format's inconveniences are worth accepting.
What travels well, and what to check
Both formats are zipped XML describing the same kinds of thing, so the conversion is a translation between two vocabularies rather than a rasterization. Most documents come through intact.
Body text, headings, bold and italic, lists, ordinary tables, images, page size and margins all map cleanly. So do footnotes, headers and footers. For a report, a letter or a set of meeting notes, the converted file is usually indistinguishable from one authored in Word.
The parts to look at are where the two formats model things differently. Complex nested tables — tables inside table cells — sometimes lose a border or a width. Text boxes and floating images can shift, because anchoring rules differ. Automatic numbering that restarts at a specific point occasionally renumbers from the top. Equations translate through a different model again and deserve a direct look.
Tracked changes and comments generally survive, and are worth verifying specifically if the document is going into a review cycle, because losing a revision history silently is worse than losing formatting.
The efficient check is to open both and compare the last page. Layout drift accumulates, so any difference in how content flows shows up most clearly at the end — a document that ends on the same page with the same content is a document that survived.
Fonts are the usual cause of drift
When a converted document looks close but not quite right, the reason is generally that it is being rendered with different type.
A .docx names the fonts it wants; it does not usually contain them. If the document was written with a font the recipient does not have, their software substitutes something else, and the replacement has different letter widths. Lines wrap differently, paragraphs grow or shrink by a line, and content moves.
This is invisible on the machine that created the file, because that machine has the fonts. It appears only on the recipient's screen, which is precisely where you cannot check it.
The reliable fix is to use fonts the destination will certainly have. Arial, Times New Roman, Calibri and Cambria are safe in Word; Liberation Sans and Liberation Serif are the metric-compatible equivalents that make LibreOffice documents behave in Word. Avoid anything decorative or newly installed unless you know the recipient has it.
Where the layout genuinely matters and the recipient only needs to read it, send a PDF. The fonts are embedded and the question does not arise.
Examples
A report going to a client
Less than half the size, which surprises people who assume the Microsoft format is the bloated one. Both are zipped XML; LibreOffice simply writes more metadata and a fuller style catalog by default. Neither number says anything about quality.
A document that will come back edited
This is the case worth converting for. Both formats record revisions and comments, and they map onto each other, so the reviewer can work normally and you can read their marks when it returns. Sending the ODT and asking them to cope is where collaboration actually breaks down.
Frequently asked questions
Can Word not just open an ODT?
It can. Microsoft has supported OpenDocument since 2007 and the fidelity is reasonable. What it will not do is make the file look like a document your recipient recognizes — the icon is generic, the extension is unfamiliar, and some mail systems and document-management platforms refuse to preview or even accept it. Converting removes a conversation you would otherwise have.
What is most likely to shift?
Anything positioned rather than structured. Text frames, images anchored to a specific spot on the page, multi-column sections and complex headers are where the two layout engines interpret the same description slightly differently. Body text, headings, tables, lists, footnotes and cross references are reliable.
What happens if it comes back and I convert it again?
Each pass through a format boundary costs a little, because anything with no exact equivalent gets approximated, and approximating an approximation compounds. One round trip is usually invisible. Five is not. If a document is going to bounce back and forth repeatedly, agree on a single format at the start and stay in it.
Are fonts a problem?
Frequently, and it is not really a format issue. A document is a reference to a font, not a copy of it, so if you used a typeface the recipient does not have, their machine substitutes something and the line breaks move. Sticking to fonts that ship with both Windows and macOS avoids it, and exporting to PDF avoids it completely for anything nobody needs to edit.